The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us book. Happy reading The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us Pocket Guide.

Noordmans, O.. Norton, J. Cosmic confusions: Not supporting versus supporting not. Philosophy of.

Paley, W.. Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Penrose, R.. Singularities and time-asymmetry. General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary.

Get this edition

Hawking, S. Survey pp. Philipse, H.. God in the Age of Science? A Critique of Religious Reason. Oxford: Oxford. Planck intermediate results - XXIV. Constraints on variations in fundamental constants - Planck Collaboration Ade, P. Planck results. Cosmological parameters - Planck Collaboration Ade, P.

  1. Violin Sonata in D, Op.11 No.2, Erster Teil, score;
  2. The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us.
  3. The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life - NASA/ADS.
  4. 101 Ideas to Kick Your Ass Into Gear;
  5. - Document - The Fallacy of Fine-tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us;

Price, H.. Rees, M.. Just Six Numbers.

What is Kobo Super Points?

Rundle, B.. Oxford: Oxford University. Schellekens, A. Life at the interface of particle physics and string theory.

Russell Stannard - Is the Universe Fine-Tuned for Life and Mind?

Reviews of. D86 arXiv Schilpp, P. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. La Salle: Open Court. Smeenk, C.. Predictability crisis in early universe cosmology. Studies in History and.

  1. Sleeping with Paris (Charlotte Summers Series Book 1).
  2. Secular Web Kiosk: The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us.
  3. The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe is not designed for us by Victor J Stenger -- REVIEW!
  4. Non-Fiction Reviews.
  5. OECD Economic Surveys: Turkey 2010.
  6. Peer Review: The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning!
  7. The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us?

Smith,, J. M The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Freeman. Smith, Q.. Smolin, L.. The Life of the Cosmos.

Citation metadata

Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sober, E.. The Design Argument. Oxford: Blackwell. Sober, G.. Evidence and Evolution. Spinoza, B.. Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata. Amsterdam: J. Stenger, V.. Susskind, L.. The cosmic landscape: String theory and the illusion of intelligent design - Swinburne, R.. The Existence of God. Second Edition. Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters - Tegmark, Max et al. Uffink, J.. Compendium of the foundations of classical statistical physics.

Part B eds. Physics Butterfield, J. Van Wolde, E.. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 34, Wallace, D.. Ward, P. Rare Earth.

The fallacy of fine-tuning | EurekAlert! Science News

New York: Copernicus Books. The correct brief definition is that many of the universal constants of our universe have just the right values to allow atoms, stars, planets, and eventually life to exist. It does not pertain to the fine-tuning of limited things in our universe, such as our earth, which could also be fine-tuned. It is the fine-tuning of our universe as a whole which points most strongly to the existence of a Creator God.

Beginning in the preface, he immediately misleads the reader on this point by talking about the unique events in the lives of his grandparents and parents that led him to be born. By treating this as an analogy to the fine-tuning of the universe, he discounts fine-tuning as evidence for a Creator, attributing it all to chance. His worst atrocity is seen in the way in which he discounts the fine-tuning of the fundamental constants of our universe.

In section 3. Similarly, comparing the life-permitting range to the value of the parameter in our universe necessarily produces a bias toward underestimating fine-tuning, since we know that our universe is in the life-permitting range. This is nonsense, of course: a tightrope walker must overbalance in a very specific direction if her path is to be life-permitting.

The freedom to wander is tightly constrained. When identifying the life-permitting region of parameter space, the shape of the region is not particularly relevant. An elongated life-friendly region is just as fine-tuned as a compact region of the same area.

The Skeptics Society & Skeptic magazine

The fact that we can change the setting on one cosmic dial, so long as we very carefully change another at the same time, does not necessarily mean that FT [the fine-tuning claim — VJT] is false. For a universe to be life-permitting, it must satisfy a number of constraints simultaneously. For example, a universe with the right physical laws for complex organic molecules, but which re-collapses before it is cool enough to permit neutral atoms will not form life. One cannot refute FT by considering life-permitting criteria one-at-a-time and noting that each can be satisfied in a wide region of parameter space.

In set-theoretic terms, we are interested in the intersection of the life-permitting regions, not the union. They introduced cane toads, imported from Hawaii, into parts of Northern Queensland in the hope that they would eat the beetles. And thus the problem was solved forever, except for the million cane toads that now call eastern Australia home, eating smaller native animals, and secreting a poison that kills any larger animal that preys on them. When presented with a proposed fine-tuning explainer, we must ask whether the solution is more fine-tuned than the problem.

Stenger is a particle physicist, a noted speaker, and the author of a number of books and articles on science and religion. And I will show why we can expect to be able to describe any uncreated universe with the same models and laws with at most slight, accidental variations. Plausible natural explanations can be found for those parameters that are most crucial for life… My case against fine-tuning will not rely on speculations beyond well-established physics nor on the existence of multiple universes.

There are a great many scientists, of varying religious persuasions, who accept that the universe is fine-tuned for life, e. They differ, of course, on what conclusion we should draw from this fact. Stenger, on the other hand, claims that the universe is not fine-tuned. Are the laws of nature themselves fine-tuned? Stenger defends the ambitious claim that the laws of nature could not have been different because they can be derived from the requirement that they be Point-of-View Invariant hereafter, PoVI ….

Physicists have no choice in the matter, or else their models will be subjective, that is, will give uselessly different results for every different point of view. And so the conservation principles are not laws built into the universe or handed down by deity to govern the behavior of matter. They are principles governing the behavior of physicists.